BreakPoint

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Funny threads

Oh are we comparing cars now?  Story time.

 

My daily driver is a 2003 Cavalier.  They were basically marketed as disposable cars, meant for new drivers.  Mine is a 2.2L 4 cylinder.  It currently has 265,000 miles, on the original engine, original transmission, original radiator, original clutch and I just replaced the original starter.  Bonus points for having it be the car I learned how to drive a stick on and still have the original clutch.  Over the years I've been doing less and less maintenance on it because the car isn't really worth it.  It should probably have new tires but then the tires will be worth more than the car.  The last set of tires we got were used because we didn't expect it to last this long.

 

It is as far from loaded as possible.  No power locks, no power windows, no tilt, no cruise, no tape deck or CD player just AM/FM.  The wipers don't even have a delay.

 

It has many things wrong with it, like having the instrument cluster flake out at times, and the front bumper being held on by several zip ties.  It was rear ended when I was stopped at a light so the trunk is a bit messed up.  And I was hit in a parking lot and a corner panel is smashed in.  The gas door rusted off, and actually the whole underside is quite rusted (this is Michigan, lots of salt and snow).  Oh and the airbags are deployed, I couldn't quite tell if this is illegal, or not, some say yes some say no.  But it rides mostly smooth, doesn't have a check engine light, and still gets about 35MPG.  If I sold it no one would give much for it, but it is worth driving it to and from work to keep miles down on my backup vehicle.  I'll just drive it into the round and scrap it out when it dies.

Message 491 of 537
(11,249 Views)

@Intaris wrote:

I had a Volkswagen TDI (1.9L 130 HP - Yeah laughable by US standards) and it got up to 200,000 km without any real problems from the motor.  Sure the cam belt needed to be changed every 60,000 km (We bought too early, newer models a few months later only needed every 90,000 and modern cars only need every 180,000).  If I ever go for Diesel again, I'd make sure it's got a chain and not a belt.


How do you get used to the sound of the diesel engine? We had one for a day while our petrol version was having some work done and we were concerned the whole time that the engine sounded unhealthy (not being used to diesel obviously).

0 Kudos
Message 492 of 537
(11,209 Views)

@Hooovahh wrote:

Oh are we comparing cars now?  Story time.

 

My daily driver is a 2003 Cavalier....

  The gas door rusted off, and actually the whole underside is quite rusted (this is Michigan, lots of salt and snow)....  I'll just drive it into the round and scrap it out when it dies.



DSCN2984.JPG

 

I have had to fight with the rust around my wife's. She planning to replace it soon.

 

Ben

Retired Senior Automation Systems Architect with Data Science Automation LabVIEW Champion Knight of NI and Prepper LinkedIn Profile YouTube Channel
0 Kudos
Message 493 of 537
(11,192 Views)

Ben wrote:

 

I have had to fight with the rust around my wife's. She planning to replace it soon.


Is that bondo?  Nice.

Message 494 of 537
(11,190 Views)

How do you get used to the sound of the diesel engine? We had one for a day while our petrol version was having some work done and we were concerned the whole time that the engine sounded unhealthy (not being used to diesel obviously).

Diesel is nothing unusual here. It wouldbe weird to NOT be used to the sound.

 

The acoustic differences are not so dramatic.  Thats true for European cars at least. I dont have experience with US cars.

0 Kudos
Message 495 of 537
(11,185 Views)

Intaris wrote:

Ps Looking at the mpg values for the Passat on a government site in the US gives a rating of 34 MPG for the car I had.  I got WAY better fuel economy than that, more like 50MPG (both versions with 130 HP and around 300Nm Torque).  I don't know if you guys get different versions of the cars or if your Diesel is so different but that's a world of difference.


And that's what really confuses/disappoints me. 

Sure, my pickup gets 10mpg.  Terrible, right...

A little 4-cyl with a third of the weight gets 30-40. 

I could put the weight of two of those cars behind my truck, and still get ~10mpg. 

Weight moved over distance per gallon of fuel, my truck's doing pretty dang well compared to those cars now.

Tractor-trailers do even better.

Locomotives are off the chart.

 

My snowmobile's about 150hp. Smiley Wink

0 Kudos
Message 496 of 537
(11,158 Views)

Hopefully, technologies employed in Freightliners "SuperTruck" proof of concept get adopted in the mainstream- double the MPG than current tractor-trailer rigs.

 

http://www.freightlinersupertruck.com/#main

 

-AK2DM

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"It’s the questions that drive us.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0 Kudos
Message 497 of 537
(11,146 Views)

Regarding economy, US gallons ≠ Imperial gallons. Thus 34 MPG for the Passat in the US is more like 40 MPG in the UK. Also, not sure what driving regime the US site stated...perhaps urban?

 

Finally, there were a number of 1.9 TDI engines that VAG produced. There were ones with less grunt (more like 100 HP), but for the 130 HP there were two versions, one with better torque. Probably a different engine mapping?

 

Economy and engine choice are horses for courses though. I'd like to have a more economical car, but my daily commute is 12.5 miles each way. A regular journey that short would be pretty ruinous for a diesel. I own a Ford Fiesta 1.4 that returns 40-50 MPG depending on how heavy my foot is and whether I have any motorway driving to do.

 

Newer three cylinder petrols, generally small units with turbos, are looking more and more appetising though. I'm still waiting for someone to make a decent hybrid which uses electric motors for drive and a petrol or diesel engine for electricity generation. Run the engine at its nominal operating conditions for economy/emissions, gain range over a pure electric car, no big battery lifecycle investment and ideal for current refuelling infrastructure.

 

As for cars, up until 3 years ago, when my wife bought a 2003 Honda CRV, we were still driving a 1995 Rover 214 as a daily driver. Most of the maintenance myself, very little went wrong - even the headgasket was original, which is quite an achievement for K series engines of the day!

---
CLA
0 Kudos
Message 498 of 537
(11,134 Views)

@AnalogKid2DigitalMan wrote:

Hopefully, technologies employed in Freightliners "SuperTruck" proof of concept get adopted in the mainstream- double the MPG than current tractor-trailer rigs.

 

http://www.freightlinersupertruck.com/#main

 

-AK2DM

 


I hope they design trucks better than websites.  That was painful to scroll and very slow graphics.  Impossible on Firefox.  Only slightly better on IE.

0 Kudos
Message 499 of 537
(11,119 Views)

This is why you should all change to kW and L/100km 😛

Message 500 of 537
(11,095 Views)