BreakPoint

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Monthly Bugs, August 2016

Continued from the July 2016 bug thread

 

 The posting rules are as always:

 

  • Each post here should only contain a brief description of a bug, together with a link to the thread where it is being discussed.
  • One post/bug!
  • One bug/post!
  • No discussion of bugs. All discussions of a bug must take place in the original linked thread.
 
0 Kudos
Message 1 of 9
(10,685 Views)

Wrong linestyle showing for plots in 2016 waveform charts.

 

CAR# 600682

0 Kudos
Message 2 of 9
(10,600 Views)

Under certain conditions, a cursor locked to an xy plot goes haywire.

 

Details

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 9
(10,555 Views)

As hinted in the discusssion of the bug right above, there is an omission for the "Map coordinates to xy"  method. It does not say what the boolean returns. (The method for the other direction is better described)

 

Map XY To Coordinates Method

Mentions that it "returns true" (Good!), but the boolean output is not listed in the parameter table (Bad!).

(It is listed under "data type", but I don't even know what the means here....Why does it even need a data type? Since it is always true, it carries no useful information)

 

Map Coordinates To XY Method

Does not mention the boolean output at all (except as the "data type"), even though it is there. (Bad!&Bad!)

 

Hmmmm.... Feel free to discuss in the linked thread.

 

0 Kudos
Message 4 of 9
(10,553 Views)

The error seems to be only in the "Constraint Nonlinear Curve Fit" , details & work around here

> CAR 590370 has been filed to track this issue. This will be fixed in next release of LabVIEW.

Greetings from Germany
Henrik

LV since v3.1

“ground” is a convenient fantasy

'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'


0 Kudos
Message 5 of 9
(10,505 Views)

Many years ago, it was achnowledged that the output of reshape array is inconsistent if one of the dimensions is zero. Behavior is still present in LV2016. I wonder if there is a CAR. 

0 Kudos
Message 6 of 9
(10,469 Views)

Under certain conditions, feedback nodes fail to work with matrix data, breaking perfectly legal code, either at edit time or on first run. (details).

0 Kudos
Message 7 of 9
(10,451 Views)

Continued in the September 2016 bug thread.

 

This thread is now closed.

0 Kudos
Message 8 of 9
(10,382 Views)

CAR 590370 was fixed in LabVIEW 2017. See the 2017 LabVIEW Bug Fix List for details: https://www.ni.com/en/support/documentation/bugs/17/labview-2017-bug-fixes.html

--------------------------------------
Message 9 of 9
(9,382 Views)