Broken Wire but Runnable. Should I be concerned?

[_carl]

How concerned should I be if I have a few VIs where the run arrow is not broken, but a wire regularly shows up as broken?

If I replace the wire, it's non-broken again.  But when I come back to this VI later (perhaps after recompile), the wire's broken again -- even though all code runs.  I've seen this in a few places -- and yes, the VI on the right is a malleable VI.

LV 23, Q1, 64-bit.

[TiTou]

I've seen this a few times with malleable VIs in LV 2020, I thought it had been fixed.

Most times, the Vi is fine and the display is wrong, all you need is a recompile.

[wiebe@CARYA]

I'd be worried about that unbundle though 😊.

.vims cause all combinations, broken wires\running VI, good wires\broken VI, broken wires\broken VI...

[paul_a_cardinale]

---

wiebe@CARYA wrote:

I'd be worried about that unbundle though 😊.

.vims cause all combinations, broken wires\running VI, good wires\broken VI, broken wires\broken VI...

---

That's the coolest unbundle I've ever seen.  How do you do that?

[wiebe@CARYA]

---

@paul_a_cardinale wrote:

---

wiebe@CARYA wrote:

I'd be worried about that unbundle though 😊.

.vims cause all combinations, broken wires\running VI, good wires\broken VI, broken wires\broken VI...

---

That's the coolest unbundle I've ever seen.  How do you do that?

---

I assumed the image was obfuscated by the user (e.g. in paint).