04-28-2008 12:27 AM
04-30-2008 10:04 AM
05-18-2012 04:41 AM
Hi,
It is great to talk about a nanosecond clock but how to you beat Bill Gates. There are those of us with academic versions (without all the modules) that find simple timing within the computer a problem. Nanoseconds at you chip legs you would think 100 baud would be a snap: Receive the pulse off the zero switch of your 50 Hz's as a Phase Lock Loop. Then send a bit stream out the printer port synchronized to this. Program wise no problem, time wise, where are the missing milliseconds. We know, no matter what we write in parallel the PC processing is still linear unless you are programming for multicore CPUs and hyperthreading, which I am not. So Bill gates though it would be a good idea to have an events clock at the 10 ms mark to interrupt and time slice between processes. Unfortunately at the 10 ms mark I miss the mark which means I cannot synchronize my bit stream with missing chunks of time corrupting my sync. Has anyone out there had to work around this problem.
Cheers Jim B 007