I noticed 2 sizing/positioning issues with the NXG-style controls that have increment/decrement buttons such as the Text Ring, Enum and Numeric controls. I think both problems are linked, which is why I put them in a single topic.
1. Unwanted box resizing when showing/hiding the increment/decrement buttons
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b998/6b9980b012607b71d97bba3f533b04c0031f5475" alt="Show Hide Buttons.gif Show Hide Buttons.gif"
When toggling the increment/decrement buttons visibility manually or programmatically, the white entry box is also resized. This messes up control alignment and is not consistent with controls from other styles.
I don't see why someone would want that behavior. When I set the property "Increment/Decrement Visible?" to false, I expect it to hide the buttons, not resize the box. If I wanted to resize the box, I would use the "Width" property. Notice that the Picture Ring behaves correctly, which is why I think this behaviour with the enum/ring/numeric is not expected…
2. Bad update from type definitions
NXG-style enum/ring/numeric controls can also have sizing/positioning glitches when updated from a type definition. It appears when the control in the typedef has visible increment/decrement buttons and the linked control has not, and vice-versa.
Here is an example with enum and numeric typedefs both with and without the buttons:
Before typedef updates:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ae6c/6ae6c65a776f5eecc41d39497ce62a66de5f864b" alt="raphschru_6-1677606075210.png raphschru_6-1677606075210.png"
After typedef updates:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ec5d/2ec5d9accb283799a67ab6081d45fdce34d0cd05" alt="raphschru_9-1677606254783.png raphschru_9-1677606254783.png"
Attached is a project with VIs that reproduce the problems.
For the second one, I've created a script that simulates a typedef update, so you can easily observe the glitches and reset the controls to their original states.