LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

PID with controlled ramp Options

Thanks GerdW

these are Fig 1 & Fig 2 in PNG format.

the linearity is bad when i try to repeat experiment. 😞

 

Download All
0 Kudos
Message 11 of 15
(1,377 Views)

Hi Ela,

 

the linearity is bad when i try to repeat experiment.

As we don't know anything ybout your setup nor do we know the measurement values, so we cannot comment on those curves…

 

Did you change anything in your VI according to my recommendations?

Best regards,
GerdW


using LV2016/2019/2021 on Win10/11+cRIO, TestStand2016/2019
0 Kudos
Message 12 of 15
(1,360 Views)

Which information do you need about my setup ?

now I am working to change the code based on your comments and I will try to reapet the experiment again .

0 Kudos
Message 13 of 15
(1,353 Views)

Dear GerdW

i did some changes in AI but the programme doesn't work i mean the temperature is 0 all the time .

please make right setting on DAQmx Read for me if you think something in rung or unnecessary please modify that

many thanks .

0 Kudos
Message 14 of 15
(1,327 Views)

Hi Ela,

 

i did some changes in AI but the programme doesn't work i mean the temperature is 0 all the time .

Did you also debug your VI?

Did you check the error outputs of all DAQmx functions?

 

- Why do you configure a sample rate of 1000Hz, when you read just one sample per DAQmxRead? With a timeout of 1000s?

- Why do you read this one sample as waveform when you want to work with a scalar value?

- Why do you need an ExpressVI for such a simple calculation?

- Why do you configure "buffer size" at DAQmxTiming in "continuous" mode? Did you read the help for that input?

Best regards,
GerdW


using LV2016/2019/2021 on Win10/11+cRIO, TestStand2016/2019
0 Kudos
Message 15 of 15
(1,291 Views)