11-22-2017 01:44 PM
wiebe@CARYA wrote:
I'm not too strict about that myself (also just pretty strict). If code is a sequence I don't mind too much that it is programmed as a sequence. ... Step 1, Step 2..Step 10 are all stand alone actions, and grouping them in any way would be arbitrary.
Fitting the screen is the ideal and should be the goal.
I swear that I've never met Wiebe -- we are not the same person ...
[My "sequence of tests" ...]
Bob Schor
11-22-2017 01:46 PM - edited 11-22-2017 01:49 PM
@Bob_Schor wrote:
wiebe@CARYA wrote:
I'm not too strict about that myself (also just pretty strict). If code is a sequence I don't mind too much that it is programmed as a sequence. ... Step 1, Step 2..Step 10 are all stand alone actions, and grouping them in any way would be arbitrary.
Fitting the screen is the ideal and should be the goal.
I swear that I've never met Wiebe -- we are not the same person ...
[My "sequence of tests" ...]
Bob Schor
I am afraid to ask...but is there a reason why "Test 13" is missing? 😄
Edit: maybe number 4 would be missing if you were from Asia? (i was in Korea a couple of years ago, and the floor numbering was always funny in buildings...) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetraphobia
11-22-2017 02:10 PM
@Blokk wrote:
@Bob_Schor wrote:
wiebe@CARYA wrote:
I'm not too strict about that myself (also just pretty strict). If code is a sequence I don't mind too much that it is programmed as a sequence. ... Step 1, Step 2..Step 10 are all stand alone actions, and grouping them in any way would be arbitrary.
Fitting the screen is the ideal and should be the goal.
I swear that I've never met Wiebe -- we are not the same person ...
[My "sequence of tests" ...]
Bob Schor
I am afraid to ask...but is there a reason why "Test 13" is missing? 😄
Edit: maybe number 4 would be missing if you were from Asia? (i was in Korea a couple of years ago, and the floor numbering was always funny in buildings...) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetraphobia
So THAT's why test 13 never ran.
11-22-2017 02:17 PM
Bob, of course I was just joking! 🙂 I guess there was a good reason for the number 13 being missing!
And a note to myself: i should check more often which board I write to: this is not the Breakpoint! 😄
11-23-2017 02:36 AM
@Bob_Schor wrote:
[My "sequence of tests" ...]
Bob Schor
Bob, guess I sometimes prefer all the test stuff in the main VI. But it's a borderline situation... SubVI's like this isn't too bad, but all the good stuff is a few clicks away. My choice either way (on-liner style or Sub VI's) might very well depend on the weather.
Nowadays I'd probably have a class wire between all those VI's if I go for Sub VI's. With reporting functions, you usually end up needing some previous results (logo height and such). Class wire is perfect for that (as I'm sure you know).
Bob_Schor wrote:I swear that I've never met Wiebe -- we are not the same person ...
I second that.
More OT: Looking forward to NI Week! Days of beer and nerd stuff: doesn't get much better.