LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

integration of decaying acceleration signal

Solved!
Go to solution

Hi

 

I have an experimental acceleration signal that is decaying with respect to time

 

I want to get velocity by integrating this signal. Practically the velocity signal should also decay with respect to time. But the integrated signal is not decaying ? Where am I making a mistake?

 

Corresponding VI and The AccelerationDATA is in the attached files.

 

Thanks in anticipation

Download All
0 Kudos
Message 1 of 7
(3,128 Views)

Hi

 

Sorry for inconvenience

 

Photo is attached herewith.

0 Kudos
Message 2 of 7
(3,127 Views)
Solution
Accepted by Sehgal

Looks like you have some positive DC offset in the accel signal which then integrates into a velocity ramp.  A quick and dirty approximate solution would be to subtract off the best-fit straight line from the integrated velocity.

 

-Kevin P

ALERT! LabVIEW's subscription-only policy came to an end (finally!). Unfortunately, pricing favors the captured and committed over new adopters -- so tread carefully.
Message 3 of 7
(3,109 Views)

Or, as I just posted to the same question in the Signal Conditioning Board, subtract the mean before integrating.

 

Lynn

0 Kudos
Message 4 of 7
(3,106 Views)

I put a link to this thread in the other Board.  Let's keep the discussion here.

 

Lynn

0 Kudos
Message 5 of 7
(3,103 Views)

Sehgal wrote

 

I want to get velocity by integrating this signal. Practically the velocity signal should also decay with respect to time. But the integrated signal is not decaying ? Where am I making a mistake?



I think your mistake is your understanding of an integration 😉
If you accelerate something and stop the accelerating the item will stay at a constant velocity .....

 

If you want to include something like friction to get the velocity down to zero, I would add a 1 order highpass filter ... and put the timeconstant somewhere in the seconds rage ...

 

Greetings from Germany
Henrik

LV since v3.1

“ground” is a convenient fantasy

'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'


0 Kudos
Message 6 of 7
(3,074 Views)

Thanks Kevin

 

Using your technique I have solved the problem.

 

Thanks a lot

0 Kudos
Message 7 of 7
(3,070 Views)