If you really cared about "randomness" your time would be better
spent implementing a better PRNG than determining a better seed for the
current one. The value you enter is run through the grinder a couple
of times before it enters into the recurrence, so any distribution of
1's and 0's you try to introduce is diluted away. All seeds are
essentially equal. Unless you are doing cryptography or large-scale
Monte Carlo simulations you'll probably be very well served by the
existing VI.
I think the primary reason that seeding is
even an option is that certain applications (games, encrypters) might
be rendered useless if some devious individual were able to anticipate
the "random" numbers. This is not so hard to do if you know the
seeding algorithm and the value of the computer clock. That is why
there is an art to choosing a seed, not any inherent improvement of the
resulting stream.
