setting priority- common output

[RENN]

does this look like an action Engine??

please give your valuable suggestions.

RENN

[Ben]

Yes that looks like an AE!

"Use default" on a tunnel is OK if you are passing data out. You don't need a sepearte tunnel for each ouput (provide your data type is the same and it looks that way). What you do have to watch for with "use default" is tunnels that carry the SR data. In normally mark those as NOT use Default as a way of forcing me to think abou those tunnels.

make you Action an Enum so that maintenance is easier.

What its the "wait" action for?

Once I have a preliminary Ae coded up, I'll usually write-up a "tester" to test it out.

SO it looks like you are moving the right direction.

If you have further Q's please spell them out so we can focus were it will do the most good.

Ben

[Ben]

Another note...

When coding up AE that are implenting a complex control scheme, it helps me a lot to write up a truth table describing all of the conditions BEFORE I code. This lets me analyze the logic to simlify were possible.

I'll then cut-n-paste that truth table into the BD (as an image) to guide my coding.

And when you have to return to that code some day in the future, the truth table will get you right back on the same page quickly.

Just trying to hlp,

Ben

[RENN]

Thanks a lot Ben.

i've successfully completed the Project. especially thanking you for introducing me the term 'Action Engine'.

it really helped me to achieve my goal with ease.

Advanced Christmas and Newyear wishes

Renn