DQMH Consortium Toolkits Feature Requests

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Taggart

Add Circular Dependency check to Validator

Status: Declined

Hi @Taggart,

Thank you for your suggestion. That would be an interesting piece of information to get for the developers.

That being said, we don't think the validator is the right place to implement this feature.

A tool like Antidoc could be a better way to get and display it.

 

Thank you again for your time sharing your idea to make the DQMH framework better than ever!

 

Olivier  

It would nice to catch circular dependencies in the DQMH Validator Tool. Catching all circular dependencies would be hard ie A->B->C->D->A, but the simple case would be easy to catch A->B->A. This would be the case where A registers for the broadcasts of B but also sends requests to B.

 

If anyone has an easy way to catch the more complicated case, I'd be all for that too.

Sam Taggart
CLA, CPI, CTD, LabVIEW Champion
DQMH Trusted Advisor
Read about my thoughts on Software Development at sasworkshops.com/blog
GCentral
1 Comment
Olivier-JOURDAN
Active Participant
Status changed to: Declined

Hi @Taggart,

Thank you for your suggestion. That would be an interesting piece of information to get for the developers.

That being said, we don't think the validator is the right place to implement this feature.

A tool like Antidoc could be a better way to get and display it.

 

Thank you again for your time sharing your idea to make the DQMH framework better than ever!

 

Olivier  


Olivier Jourdan

Wovalab founder | DQMH Consortium board member | LinkedIn |

Stop writing your LabVIEW code documentation, use Antidoc!