LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

IMAQ Zoom to fit option changes the image details

Solved!
Go to solution

Hi,

 

We see that using the zoom to fit option in LabVIEW IMAQ Display adds some stripes to the image which we do not see in the actual image.

I need to know why this behavior is seen and how to avoid this.

 

SweathaK_0-1722619210033.png

 

Thanks,

Sweatha

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 5
(441 Views)

What you see are Moiré patterns due to a non-integer relationship between image pixels and monitor pixels.

Message 2 of 5
(418 Views)

We have 2 systems - one runs LV 8.2 on windows XP and other runs LV 2020 on windows 10.

 

In LV 8.2 there is no issues seen and zoom in/out is done by factor of 2X (1X,2X,4X,8X,..). In all the zoom levels, the pattern is looking the same

 

But in LV2020, it scales in 1+ (1X,2X,3X,4X,..). This pattern issue is seen at certain zoom levels like 0.17X and Zoom-to-fit.

 

Is there a way to change the zoom factor in LV2020 to zoom the same levels as old LV?

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 5
(408 Views)

I dont know 8.1 but I would check if your imaq displays are the same size in both versions. Maybe one is one pixel wider.

Actor Framework
0 Kudos
Message 4 of 5
(393 Views)
Solution
Accepted by SweathaK

@SweathaK wrote:

But in LV2020, it scales in 1+ (1X,2X,3X,4X,..). This pattern issue is seen at certain zoom levels like 0.17X and Zoom-to-fit.

 

Is there a way to change the zoom factor in LV2020 to zoom the same levels as old LV?


It doesn't look like you can. You could add a Mouse Up/Down event case in your event structure, read out the ZoomInteger property and adjust it accordingly but it will be quite convoluted.

 

I would add a few buttons and use the event structure to set the zoom to 1x, 1/2x, 1/4x etc.

 

As for the zoom to fit function; you could change the Image Area Size property to be 1/4 of the original image size so that zoom to fit will be the same as 1/4 zoom.

 

In this case:

RamonG_0-1722858111654.png

 

Message 5 of 5
(366 Views)