LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Is it possible to prorammatically move a control out of a case structre

Solved!
Go to solution

@Seau1 wrote:

Thank you very much for the help, I will try your solution as fast a possible. I need this because I have to fix a VI Generator which saves the controls and indicators inside of diagramms.


Isn't it better to fix the generator so controls are created outside? 🙂

/Y

G# - Award winning reference based OOP for LV, for free! - Qestit VIPM GitHub

Qestit Systems
Certified-LabVIEW-Developer
Message 11 of 16
(625 Views)

I was also thinking about it but I think that is way more complicated in this case and I'm not sure if it is possible. Well I'm not a LabView expert so I could be wrong

0 Kudos
Message 12 of 16
(617 Views)

@Seau1 wrote:

I was also thinking about it but I think that is way more complicated in this case and I'm not sure if it is possible. Well I'm not a LabView expert so I could be wrong


Just like with the Move-block, the Create VI Object have an 'owner' input. That just needs to be the top level diagram instead of a while loop. 🙂

 

G# - Award winning reference based OOP for LV, for free! - Qestit VIPM GitHub

Qestit Systems
Certified-LabVIEW-Developer
0 Kudos
Message 13 of 16
(615 Views)

Well we use an existing VI as template to create the VI with complicated code and I'm not a fan of changing another persons code when I'm not sure what it is exactly doing. 

0 Kudos
Message 14 of 16
(602 Views)

@Seau1 wrote:

Well we use an existing VI as template to create the VI with complicated code and I'm not a fan of changing another persons code when I'm not sure what it is exactly doing. 


What's the worst thing that can happen? 😉

(Famous last words)

G# - Award winning reference based OOP for LV, for free! - Qestit VIPM GitHub

Qestit Systems
Certified-LabVIEW-Developer
Message 15 of 16
(596 Views)

@Seau1 wrote:

Well we use an existing VI as template to create the VI with complicated code and I'm not a fan of changing another persons code when I'm not sure what it is exactly doing. 


So... You're changing it with scripting because you don't want to change it manually because you don't know what it is doing? 

 

Saying it like that (and that is how we read it) it is quite funny.😁

 

BTW. By now this might read as a personal attack, but we're just curious... Please remember we only get to see a small peace of the puzzle, and (humorous) tone gets lost over text. I'm sure you have good reasons, you don't have to justify yourself if you don't want to,  it's absolutelly none of our business, etc., etc..

0 Kudos
Message 16 of 16
(595 Views)