03-30-2020 01:41 AM
@Seau1 wrote:
Thank you very much for the help, I will try your solution as fast a possible. I need this because I have to fix a VI Generator which saves the controls and indicators inside of diagramms.
Isn't it better to fix the generator so controls are created outside? 🙂
/Y
03-30-2020 02:59 AM
I was also thinking about it but I think that is way more complicated in this case and I'm not sure if it is possible. Well I'm not a LabView expert so I could be wrong
03-30-2020 03:03 AM
@Seau1 wrote:
I was also thinking about it but I think that is way more complicated in this case and I'm not sure if it is possible. Well I'm not a LabView expert so I could be wrong
Just like with the Move-block, the Create VI Object have an 'owner' input. That just needs to be the top level diagram instead of a while loop. 🙂
03-30-2020 09:00 AM
Well we use an existing VI as template to create the VI with complicated code and I'm not a fan of changing another persons code when I'm not sure what it is exactly doing.
03-30-2020 09:31 AM
@Seau1 wrote:
Well we use an existing VI as template to create the VI with complicated code and I'm not a fan of changing another persons code when I'm not sure what it is exactly doing.
What's the worst thing that can happen? 😉
(Famous last words)
03-30-2020 09:34 AM
@Seau1 wrote:
Well we use an existing VI as template to create the VI with complicated code and I'm not a fan of changing another persons code when I'm not sure what it is exactly doing.
So... You're changing it with scripting because you don't want to change it manually because you don't know what it is doing?
Saying it like that (and that is how we read it) it is quite funny.😁
BTW. By now this might read as a personal attack, but we're just curious... Please remember we only get to see a small peace of the puzzle, and (humorous) tone gets lost over text. I'm sure you have good reasons, you don't have to justify yourself if you don't want to, it's absolutelly none of our business, etc., etc..