LabVIEW Tech Preview Opinion

[tst]

---

@User002 wrote:

I have been using NI SW products for more than a decade.

---

And this qualifies you to make the comments you made about the tech preview ... how?

If you're unhappy about things you have several basic options:

1. Try to make the thing better.
2. Stop using that thing so that you don't feel the pain.
3. Just vent.

Of the three, I would say the third is the least productive, yet it seems to be the one you chose. Good luck with that. My personal choice would be 1, and if I saw that didn't work out, probably 2.

[Hooovahh]

---

@User002 wrote:

---

Hooovahh wrote: (...) Bzztt

  

---

@tst

Are you taking notes?  This is how it's done.

[User002]

---

@tst wrote:

---

@User002 wrote:

I have been using NI SW products for more than a decade.

---

And this qualifies you to make the comments you made about the tech preview ... how?

If you're unhappy about things you have several basic options:

1. Try to make the thing better.
2. Stop using that thing so that you don't feel the pain.
3. Just vent.

Of the three, I would say the third is the least productive, yet it seems to be the one you chose. Good luck with that. My personal choice would be 1, and if I saw that didn't work out, probably 2.

---

You know what, stick to giving feedback to NI regarding their fantastic new programming environment instead of pestering my forum post with passive-aggressive drivel?

Contributing absolutely ZERO to the discussion I intended of the lousy SW dev. org and technology decisions made by the people running it.

How about that? Too difficult? You got enough intellect to comprehend such things?

[tst]

---

@User002 wrote:

You got enough intellect to comprehend such things?

---

Apparently not, since I haven't even seen this discussion you're speaking of, just a bunch of complaints, apparent insults and links to videos.

Is NI bad at designing software and choosing technologies as an organization? Maybe. If you think it is, you're welcome to present such an argument, but I suggest you make it clear and respectful towards your audience, if not towards NI, if you expect people to listen. Otherwise, my reply is "k".

[Hooovahh]

I don't know I always like a numbered list, kinda feels like contributing something greater than 0.  

Wow that didn't take long.

Hooovahh wrote:  "hey guy what's up with all these comments."

[User002]

I always wondered how much of an intellect it takes to actually stay on the thread topic. But hey, passive-aggressive comments got all the hallmarks coming from a sect member after all and rationality can't be expected.

[User002]

Geez, no wonder they could run the Tech Preview for this long with a brainwashed cheerleading team like these two yahoos exemplifies.

[Hooovahh]

As stated there is no thread to derail.  Posting random memes and pictures doesn't really bode well for you keeping on topic either.  I quite clearly asked you what statement you were trying to make, and you haven't really said anything yet.

"Are you saying NI should abandon what is being shown in the tech preview, and instead license another company to write their software for them?"  This was not a rhetorical question, I really was trying to understand what you are trying to say.

I'm not sure what defines low intelligence, or being a cheerleader but I assume this is a poor attempt at insulting the only members of the community who wanted to converse with you.  

Present an argument for your statement, which has yet to be defined.

[User002]

---

@Hooovahh wrote:

Present an argument for your statement, which has yet to be defined.

---

You have already passed my point of not to be taken seriously.

Just find another thread.

[User002]

Yay and we seem to be back onto the thread tracks!

I know you'd love to have some of the technologies in UE 4 at your disposal when programming your next LV system. 

Give me a kudo if you agree with me!