Single Action Events in Continuous Loop

[GRCK5000]

Hi Thayermcc,

Let's get this done. Let's not make this threat more than 2 pages.   Can you check out the attached VI and let us know if it works for you.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Matthew 7:21 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[altenbach]

---

@GRCK5000 wrote:

Let's get this done. Let's not make this threat more than 2 pages.   Can you check out the attached VI and let us know if it works for you.

---

It is incorrect to hide the terminal for the "first occurrence" indicator inside the case structure, because it will never ever turn FALSE again during the execution of the VI. Most of the rest of the code seems flawed too....

I recommend to limit posting of VI only after they are fully tested and debugged and working correctly.

[GRCK5000]

Hi Mr. Altenbach,

if it’s flawed, feel free to correct it. I’m also here to learn. If I don’t post anything, then I’m also preventing myself from learning. All I’m trying to do is to help. Keyword: “trying”. Better than not even to try. But let’s get back to the OP subject. Please Mr. Altenbach, post a VI that will help him. He has been seeking help for 2 days.😏 please do not keep your answer to yourself, please share it, let’s not be selfish 😜

~~~~~~~~~~~ Acts 3:19 ~~~~~~~~~~~~

[altenbach]

It's not helping if you lead the OPs deeper into the swamp. if YOU want to learn you should not distract others trying to learn too. Hijacking other threads for your own purpose is not the right thing to do.

(I would also avoid all these completely offtopic signature lines. Things like religion and politics don't belong in a technical forum because they are always offensive to at least 50% of the participants).

[GRCK5000]

Hi Mr. Altenbach,

Page 1 of this thread = understanding thayermcc's request(s).  

Page 2 = Let's get the job done. 😂; it's all about execution. Please post your VI. We are all waiting; We all know you are the best of the best when it comes to programming.

Please let's focus on the thread, not on me. You could've just ignored my answer. Haha. I bet tharyermcc is waiting impatiently. He did a great job giving us all the information that we need to help. Now it's time to help. I'm waiting to see your VI. 😉

If you want to have a conversation with me, I'd be glad to make a thread called "reasoning with Mr. Altenbach" 😂

I'm done talking.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 Corinthians 1: 25 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[thayermcc]

Since this thread has moved away from my question, I've decided to mark Tom's first post as the solution since the note about bundling into a cluster was the key to me figuring out what I ended up doing. 

Per my last post, if Tom or anyone else sees flaws in the way the code that I most recently posted functions, I would certainly appreciate having those pointed out to me.

Thanks again,

Thayer

[altenbach]

---

@thayermcc wrote:

I've attached code that accomplishes this (and in a previous version too!) I just feel like there is probably a simpler solution to this problem. But maybe there isn't.

---

Here's a quick draft of what I might do (using a simulated temperature rise). Maybe you can glean some ideas. Note that you can modify it for as many thresholds as you like by just resizing a diagram constant.