LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

What's with 12AM Friday January 01, 1904?

Wow... 5 stars to all who provided insight into this.

Always nice to learn these little tidbits of computer history.  Thanks guys.
0 Kudos
Message 11 of 16
(3,393 Views)

Will.D a écrit :
Wow... 5 stars to all who provided insight into this.

Always nice to learn these little tidbits of computer history.  Thanks guys.
 

Indeed

We were wondering why was LabVIEW using this reference. And now, we have a full answer.

 

Nice story

Message 12 of 16
(3,003 Views)

Normally I would chastise a user for resurecting a 8 year old thread.  But I'm so glad you did, there are some interesting reads in this thread that I would have otherwise missed.  Thanks.

0 Kudos
Message 13 of 16
(2,990 Views)

@Hooovahh wrote:

Normally I would chastise a user for resurecting a 8 year old thread.  But I'm so glad you did, there are some interesting reads in this thread that I would have otherwise missed.  Thanks.


So, necromancy can be used for good. 🙂

Great read!

 

/Y

G# - Award winning reference based OOP for LV, for free! - Qestit VIPM GitHub

Qestit Systems
Certified-LabVIEW-Developer
0 Kudos
Message 14 of 16
(2,949 Views)

@jasonhill wrote:
Earlier than that.  The 32-bit date will overflow sometime around 2040. Then we can party like its 1904! Robot Very Happy
 

Just so nobody does get a wrong idea. This was when LabVIEW used a U32 as timestamp value since MacOS used that too. They did however change that to a double precision floating point number quite early on, which doesn't have that limit anymore. A double precision floating point has an almost indefinite upper range for this, although the precision will get less accurate, eventually being less precise than one second at around 2^53 seconds from January 1, 1904, which is some 250'000'000 years from now.

 

But in LabVIEW 7 they decided that this was not enough and introduced the new timestamp datatype. That one can address +-2^63 seconds from 1904 and that is about +-250 billion years and has a theoretical resolution of 1/(2^32) seconds. It has 64 bits for the fractional part but the lower 32 bits are not used as far as I can tell.

Rolf Kalbermatter
My Blog
Message 15 of 16
(2,925 Views)

In addition to Rolfs explaination here's a LabVIEW Timestamp white paper

Kudos are welcome...
Message 16 of 16
(2,875 Views)