LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Window Size vs Appearance (4k monitor)

I'm trying to get a window to fit a 1920x1080 resolution monitor, but having trouble actually visualizing this on my laptop.  As I'm understanding, there should be a 1:1 pixel mapping between the height and width settings in window size properties and a monitor's display resolution (that is, height=1080, width=1920 should fit to a 1920x1080 desktop).  But I'm running LabVIEW on a 4k monitor (3840x2160), and as a result there is scaling to increase visibility of non-4k applications.  My window which is set to 1920x1080 appears enormous (much larger than it should), even on non-4k monitors I hook up as secondary monitors from my laptop, which is probably due to the scaling.  So my question is: even though it may not look correct, am I correct in setting the height and width as I did for a 1920x1080 fit?  Or is there another mapping ratio?  I'd try this on another system with a non-4k monitor if I had access to it currently!  Thanks!

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 3
(3,234 Views)
LabVIEW does not play very well with any desktop scaling other than 100% (from display options). Some things scale, others don't.

You are correct that LabVIEW is pixel/bitmap based, rather than vector-based - which is why it has problems with high resolution displays.

My suggestion is to either:
- Set the display scaling to 100%
- Use your monitor with a lower resolution (e.g. 1920x1080 is exactly half)


LabVIEW Champion, CLA, CLED, CTD
(blog)
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 3
(3,191 Views)

You will also want to set your window height to be a little less than the screen's height resolution.  You will want to account for the taskbar that is typically at the bottom of the screen.


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
0 Kudos
Message 3 of 3
(3,182 Views)