error 1 getting que status in lvlib

[ssnp]

I am trying to add some feature in previously build vi  in labview 11 service pack 1. While calling sub vi i am getting message:

Error 1 occurred at Get Queue Status in NI_LVConfig.lvlib:Get File Path.vi->NI_LVConfig.lvlib:Close Config Data.vi->

also some one could guide me how to get more information about  .lvlib that will be great!

[ssnp]

I am trying to add some feature in previously build vi  in labview 11 service pack 1. While calling sub vi i am getting message:

Error 1 occurred at Get Queue Status in NI_LVConfig.lvlib:Get File Path.vi->NI_LVConfig.lvlib:Close Config Data.vi->

also some one could guide me how to get more information about  .lvlib that will be great!

[Tori.M · Accepted solution]

Hi ssnp,

Firstly I'd like to clarify that I interpreted your question correctly. Some coding has already been created in LabVIEW 2011 SP1 and you're trying to call a subVI that was already included in this coding? Did you create this original coding? And if not, do you also have LabVIEW 2011 SP1 on your PC? Finally with the subVI, which subVI is it? Is it the Get Queue Status subVI?

Assuming you have error handling in your code, if you right-click on the Error Out box and explain error what does the message say?

Error 1 seems to suggest that an input parameter is invalid and therefore that you haven't wired the correct inputs into this subVI. Assuming this is the Get Queue Status VI that you are using, you can check which input parameters are required and particular expected values from the help file.

Does this help to solve your problem?

Best wishes,

[smercurio_fc]

You already asked this question before, and instead of providing the requested information, you decided to post the message again.

Explain why we should help you.

[Ben]

Two possiblities.

1) The config file was alrady closed.

2) You did not wire a valid ref to the Close.

Ben

[ssnp]

Thanks!

  The program was trying to read empty file. That seems was the problem! Many many thanks for help!

[ssnp]

I have answer for your counter question. lol!

I  would want to say that you should help because you can!

Thanks for reply any way!

[smercurio_fc]

---

@ssnp wrote:

I have answer for your counter question. lol!

I  would want to say that you should help because you can!

---

One cannot help if one does not provide adequate information.

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

[nyc_(is_out_of_here)]

---

@smercurio_fc wrote:

---

@ssnp wrote:

I have answer for your counter question. lol!

I  would want to say that you should help because you can!

---

One cannot help if one does not provide adequate information.

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

---

I think you meant One cannot help if one is NOT provided with adequate information.

Seems to be that the OP believes that mindreading is another skill others possess.

[smercurio_fc]

---

@nyc_(is_out_of_here) wrote:

---

@smercurio_fc wrote:

---

@ssnp wrote:

I have answer for your counter question. lol!

I  would want to say that you should help because you can!

---

One cannot help if one does not provide adequate information.

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

---

I think you meant One cannot help if one is NOT provided with adequate information.

Seems to be that the OP believes that mindreading is another skill others possess.

---

My "ones" were two different "ones". But your version is clearer.

[nyc_(is_out_of_here)]

---

@smercurio_fc wrote:

---

@nyc_(is_out_of_here) wrote:

---

@smercurio_fc wrote:

---

@ssnp wrote:

I have answer for your counter question. lol!

I  would want to say that you should help because you can!

---

One cannot help if one does not provide adequate information.

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

---

I think you meant One cannot help if one is NOT provided with adequate information.

Seems to be that the OP believes that mindreading is another skill others possess.

---

My "ones" were two different "ones". But your version is clearer.

---

ah!     LOL.