06-06-2011 12:32 AM - edited 06-06-2011 12:34 AM
Hi all,
This code was working with Labview 2009, but it doesn't seems to work with 2010, do I make something wrong ?
Regards,
06-07-2011 03:56 AM
Hi ramses64,
you're right.
Your example isn't working with LV2010 SP1.
I tried so solve your problem with a workaround.
Please check it, if this is ok for you.
Best regards
Dippi
06-07-2011 04:25 AM
Hi,
thanks for your answer.
This solution doesn't solve my problem : I want to display digital signals (same problem on mixed graph) on absolute time, not relative.
And my signal hasn't constant dt, so I used this method in LV 2009, and that was working...
Regards,
06-07-2011 08:39 AM
Hi ramses64,
I installed LV 2009 SP1 and tested your example.
And it doesn't work...
What can we do now?
regards
Dippi
06-07-2011 08:53 AM - edited 06-07-2011 08:55 AM
Hi,
on my previous (dead) computer, I had 2009 F3 (download here : http://joule.ni.com/nidu/cds/view/p/id/1542/lang/fr )
Could you please test with this patch (I'm really sure that this method worked before !)
Best regards,
06-08-2011 02:19 AM
Hi ramses64,
I set up a complete new system.
Then I first installed LabVIEW 2009 (without any Patch)
==> See Screenshot "LV2009_Test.jpg"
Afterwards I installed F3 patch
==> See Screenshot "PatchF3 Update.jpg"
At least I tested your example with LabVIEW 2009 F3
==> See Screenshot "LV2009F3_Test.jpg"
Somehow it doesn't work.
Because of that, I can't go to R&D and show them that behaviour.
Regards
Dippi
06-08-2011 04:23 AM
Hi,
thanks for your reply,
I will install LV2009 with F3 patch, and will prove to you that I'm not dreaming (I hope !)
I'll come back soon.
Best regards,
06-14-2011 01:42 PM
Hi,
I have no time to test with a blank OS, and LV 2009 with F3, but I think (and I'm sure) this is a bug.
My problem : I want to plot a numerical XY graph, with absolute time : instead of writing a huge quantities of datas, I want to write only when a change occurs, to avoid useless datas, and overcharging CPU !
Is there a way to do this ?
Regards,
06-15-2011 06:03 AM
Hi ramses64,
see attached example.
I delete the FIRST timestamp.
Because of that your time starts now at zero...
Like this it works...
Please take a look at it...
Thanks
Dippi
06-15-2011 07:33 AM - edited 06-15-2011 07:34 AM
Hi,
what you've done is ploting the datas in relative time.
What I want is to plot it in absolute time...
Relative time : starts at 0, no date, no reference
Absolute time : start at a date, date included
Sorry, it's not what i'm trying to do.
The problem I think is that the X value of waveform has for max 4294967295, which is 32 bits. When you convert a timestamp to dbl, you need a 64 bits format.
So the problem is there !
Best regards,