LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

radio button no selection when I start the application

Solved!
Go to solution

hallo,

 

i have a radio button with some buttons in it. I would like that when I start the application none of the buttons is selected. There is a "allow no selection property", but this only allows the "no selection". My problem is that when I run the vi, one of the radio button is on and I would like all the buttons off.

 

thanks

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 11
(5,323 Views)
Initialize it like this:

Example_VI_BD.png
Jim
You're entirely bonkers. But I'll tell you a secret. All the best people are. ~ Alice
For he does not know what will happen; So who can tell him when it will occur? Eccl. 8:7

Message 2 of 11
(5,321 Views)

thanks for the suggestion. I'm really new to Labview... and I don't know how to get that "no selection" rectangle.

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 11
(5,293 Views)

Right click the terminal and select "Create"/"Property Node", selecting the "Value" property.  Right click on the property node and select "Create"/"Constant".

 

Steve

Message 4 of 11
(5,291 Views)
Solution
Accepted by davico
aha, thanks a lot. It works
0 Kudos
Message 5 of 11
(5,286 Views)

Ha!  I'm glad you could help. 😄

Jim
You're entirely bonkers. But I'll tell you a secret. All the best people are. ~ Alice
For he does not know what will happen; So who can tell him when it will occur? Eccl. 8:7

Message 6 of 11
(5,265 Views)

davico wrote:
aha, thanks a lot. It works

 

You should mark Jim's answer as the solution, not your own comment.

 

 

p.s. Jim, can't you also do that with a Local Variable?

Richard






0 Kudos
Message 7 of 11
(5,254 Views)

Broken Arrow wrote:

 

p.s. Jim, can't you also do that with a Local Variable?


Yes.

Jim
You're entirely bonkers. But I'll tell you a secret. All the best people are. ~ Alice
For he does not know what will happen; So who can tell him when it will occur? Eccl. 8:7

0 Kudos
Message 8 of 11
(5,240 Views)

Broken Arrow wrote:

 

You should mark Jim's answer as the solution, not your own comment.

 

 

p.s. Jim, can't you also do that with a Local Variable?


Actually I think my guy Steve get's the "Solution" or at least an assist....

 

 

Programming with local variables is like (How to say it ?....) Self-abuse.  You can get what you want but, please don't do it in public.  Smiley Wink


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
0 Kudos
Message 9 of 11
(5,210 Views)

Jeff Bohrer wrote:

Broken Arrow wrote:

 

You should mark Jim's answer as the solution, not your own comment.

 

 

p.s. Jim, can't you also do that with a Local Variable?


Actually I think my guy Steve get's the "Solution" or at least an assist....

 

 

Programming with local variables is like (How to say it ?....) Self-abuse.  You can get what you want but, please don't do it in public.  Smiley Wink


I agree with that statement in principal, but I strongly disagree that using a local in this example (in this thread) would be abuse.

Richard






0 Kudos
Message 10 of 11
(5,184 Views)