02-01-2005 03:21 PM
02-07-2005 03:57 AM
02-07-2005 02:40 PM
02-08-2005 03:41 AM
02-15-2005 04:21 AM
07-06-2005 11:40 AM
Hi all, there's a new update available for people who want it, version 2.0 has arrived.
Some interesting new functions:
Easier drawing of the zoom rectangle. When you want to draw a rectangle to the edge of the graph, you can go over the edge with the mouse, you don't have to position the mouse exactly on the edge anymore.
Many functions now support selecting just a part of a plot by drawing a rectangle before invoking a specific function, like:
"Delete data points" deletes (discards or interpolates by choice) all the data points within a drawn rectangle. Handy for deleting single spikes from a plot. For data sets with a lot of spikes it is better to choose the "delete large spikes" command in the "smooth" menu.
Resample, define a given number of data points and the program spreads them out over your plot. Might be handy when your data points are not x-equidistant.
The "open special format" settings now include axis names and graph title.
Downloading can be done the same way as the message above describes. Have fun!
Erwin Timmerman
07-07-2005 09:39 AM
07-07-2005 11:40 PM
07-08-2005 02:40 AM
Hi CVI 7.0 user, the program can be downloaded from
http://www.phys.tue.nl/people/etimmerman/specview
Bilal,
I chose for DDE for several reasons.
First of all, I knew nothing about ActiveX or DDE. I was (and still am) using CVI 6.0 and I couldn't really find a step by step tutorial about ActiveX. Furthermore I wanted to be compatible with older programs that maybe didn't support ActiveX, and because at first I only needed one command (open file), I thought it might be overkill to use ActiveX for that. I also thought about using TCP/IP, but since I only used it for programs talking to eachother on the same computer, I didn't need it. For safety reasons I didn't implement it... when the program waits for external connections who knows who will be able to connect.
However, if anyone needs TCP/IP connections, it won't be too hard to implement. It would open the possibility to measure on a UNIX computer, and then send the result via TCP/IP to Spectrum Viewer. I don't need that myself though, and I will only put extra effort into it when I know that someone needs it 🙂 For now I know only of a very little number of people who actually use the program. It's been downloaded about 200 times, but downloading a program and actually liking it when evaluating it is not the same of course. Response from users is practically nonexistant (I must say that I myself also never register freeware I like so I can see a reason why this is) so as far as I know only a very small number of people (4) really uses it. That doesn't matter though, since two of them are my collegues, and I'm paid for making their life easier 🙂 If anyone else can benefit in the process it is only a bonus.
Is there BTW an easy way to implement that a program checks for updates itself? How is this usually done? Since I don't have a user base the only way to advise people of updates is this forum, and it feels a bit like spamming to me when I do it. If the program would check itself only the real users would be bothered by the update messages.
07-08-2005 09:33 AM