04-17-2008 11:21 AM
04-17-2008 11:59 AM
04-17-2008 12:17 PM
04-18-2008 10:10 AM
04-18-2008 05:25 PM
Surprisingly enough, no 🙂
Menchar
04-21-2008 12:42 PM
04-21-2008 12:45 PM
01-23-2014 03:05 AM
I'm using CVI2009 - are there any changes concerning the mentioned behavior?
Or does anyone know a tip/trick e.g. to use build setting/steps or other tools to automatically include different libraries when switching from release to debug version of a exe/dll? (my idea is: i want to create a release and debug-version of each DLL/EXE i'm using, which may include many other release/debuggable DLLs and i don't want to switch each library type every time i change from release to debug version...)
01-23-2014 06:15 PM
Hi olhass,
From what I understand, you're wanting to change the different libraries that are built with the DLL or Executable each time you select to build in release or debug mode. BUT you don't want to have to specify the libraries each time... I guess I'm wondering why you're wanting to do this. The point of building in either debug or release mode is so that you can debug the application before you build the release version. So your build specs would most likely be the same.
Take a look at these resources and see if they're any help for you:
http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/370051M-01/cvi/usermanual/prjbldmenudebdlls/
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/2A11A12C31CABDBF86257B570079D84E?OpenDocument
The second link is a Knowledge Base article related to a switching between the build libraries for 32-bit and 64-bit configurations. So the process might be similar for doing what you're asking about.
Additionally, you'll typically get a better response from the community when you create new posts on the discussion forums as opposed to commenting on old ones. I'd recommend doing that if my post does not lead you to a solution.
01-23-2014 06:54 PM
6 years later an NI still doesn't understand the issue 😉