02-15-2011 10:30 AM
Idle events aren't so much deprecated as they're obsolete. In the sense that, once timer controls were introduced, idle events lost their reason for being. But they're not going anywhere, so it's okay to use them if you find them more convenient.
Luis
02-17-2011 09:51 AM
I couldn't resist a back-to-back comparison of the two approaches. The TIMER version managed 423 scans in 8.79 secs at 34% CPU usage. The IDLE version did 399 scans in 8.76s at 8%. I'm staying IDLE 🙂
02-17-2011 12:21 PM
I was to ask Luis some hint on when and why to use idle events instead of timers.
Seems your tests give me an answer
I assume I have to deep my knowledge on idle events
02-18-2011 02:19 AM
I would test both approaches on a loaded CPU, you may have some surprise... message queues *usually* are not happy with busy systems...