Multifunction DAQ

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

NI 9263- NI9269 precision

Solved!
Go to solution

Hello,

I have just one question . How the ni9263 and ni 9269 could have the same number of bits (n=16), the same level voltage (+/-10V) and a different precision (9263: 0.11V / 9269: 0.006V)?

I think that precision of signal depends on resolution and resolution =V/2^n. Now why the precision is different?

 

thanks

regards

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 11
(5,944 Views)

You are talking about resolution 😄

 

Range does not have to equal the max ADC range 😉

 

Precision ?  What is pecision???   I usually talk about uncertaincy tied to a measurement 🙂

 

And uncertaincy usually is a function with a lot of (statistic) variables.

 

Greetings from Germany
Henrik

LV since v3.1

“ground” is a convenient fantasy

'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'


0 Kudos
Message 2 of 11
(5,942 Views)

Hi ,

thanks for your answer.

And for precision , look at  the NI specification : http://sine.ni.com/nips/cds/view/p/lang/fr/nid/208806. We note that precision is egal to 0.11V.

thanks

 

 

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 11
(5,930 Views)
Solution
Accepted by new_ingenieur

So you found out that the number of bits doesn't tell you all 🙂

The resolution of the DAC isn't all. It needs the DAC, a reference source (build-in or external), a supply and an amplifier, all build on a PCB in a housing.

Every part plays a role to the uncertaincy/precision, common main enemies are temperature, drift (over time and temperature), humidity ....  EMC/noise/....

And, no wonder.... one part is about twice the cost of the other.

 

You can buy a resistor for less than 1c or >1000 times that value ...  both migth have the resistance ... well, at a certain point ...

 

Greetings from Germany
Henrik

LV since v3.1

“ground” is a convenient fantasy

'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'


0 Kudos
Message 4 of 11
(5,928 Views)

************************thanks for answer.Now it's very clear****************************

 

0 Kudos
Message 5 of 11
(5,920 Views)

************************thanks for answer.Now it's very clear****************************

 

0 Kudos
Message 6 of 11
(5,919 Views)

Normally i know that i must open a new topic for ask question. But i need this response very quickly it's a high importance.

Tell me if NI9263 could have an offset value? i buy it just one year ago and  i don't see 'offset' in specification.

I ask this question because i have ni 9263 + electronic circuit. On my output i have an offset .

thanks

0 Kudos
Message 7 of 11
(5,917 Views)

on page 13 I see an offset error spec.

uncalibrated 1.7% of 21.4V ...   so you migth expect up to 364mV Offset in the temprange -40 to +70°C

 

Don't know this hardware... is there a autocal or selfcalibration button in MAX?

 

 

Greetings from Germany
Henrik

LV since v3.1

“ground” is a convenient fantasy

'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'


0 Kudos
Message 8 of 11
(5,915 Views)

hi,

May be in max there are this button but i don't see them. But now What worried me , it's this value of offset .Its very high for my measure.

I have a signal of 220mV so offset egal to 364mV is very high for me.

 

Do you have tips for this?

 

regards

 

0 Kudos
Message 9 of 11
(5,907 Views)

How about doing an offset cancelation befor starting your application?

Measure the offset and include that value in your setpoint?

Greetings from Germany
Henrik

LV since v3.1

“ground” is a convenient fantasy

'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'


0 Kudos
Message 10 of 11
(5,901 Views)