TestStand 2014 (32Bit) Individual Result Reports in a BachModel Test

[Paul.Boucher]

I'm new to BatchModel tests so any direction no matter how basic is appreciated.

So far I've been successful in most of what I've attempted to do, but I am completely stuck on the report files.  As it stands right now TestStand ONLY generates a single batch report. But what I would want is individual reports for every UUT.  

I've seen and tried what is discussed in this post: https://forums.ni.com/t5/NI-TestStand/Disable-Batch-Report-TestStand-2014/m-p/3091476

But I think Im missing something more basic than this, as when I skipped the steps listed in the final post, not only do I not get the individual results, I still get a batch report.

[Paul.Boucher]

Found the answer to my own question.  If this helps anyone following me here is where to look.

Under Configure - Result Processing - Report File Pathname

The "Type of Model" is fixed based on the model type you are using

The "File/Directory Options" is what you want to change.

Unfortunately for me I want to "Specify the report file path by expression" which forces a combined Batch UUT report

Any of the other 3 options will generate separate UUT result reports, but do not let you use an expression on where to save the files.

[Paul.Boucher]

correction:   if using ATML 2.02 it creates individual reports   None of the other formats including ATML 6.01 only creates combined reports

So my question kind of gets more specific.

How do you generate ONLY UUT result reports using ATML6.01 AND specify a folder by expression?

[saki.BOMB]

Hey Paul,

I found this article about dynamically changing the report directory in TestStand:

How to Dynamically Change the Report Directory in TestStand

I also found this forum posts about disabling batch report:

How do I disable batch report in the batch model?

You can maybe try combining both?

Cheers,

[WireWeaver]

Try putting the $(UUT) macro in your Report File Path expression (second tab of the Report Options dialog).

Specifying Report File Paths by Expression

[Paul.Boucher · Accepted solution]

Thank you Saki and WireWeaver

But no neither of those solutions will work or at least is not the complete answer.

So I could almost get what I want by using the Dynamic report directory, but I will be forced to use ATML2.02

[WireWeaver · Accepted solution]

You didn't use the macro:

[Paul.Boucher]

Oh.....      Thank you that did it.  I misunderstood where you were telling me to put it.