05-16-2016 12:24 PM
05-19-2016 03:06 AM
I do not really have experience with a set-up like you are trying to do. Obviously you want to feed the input signal to two inputs connected in series. The problem is that to get an even voltage distribution the input impedances have to be closely matched, too. Input impedances usually have rather large tolerances so there is risk that one input will receive more than one half of the 600V.
I know that this will reduce the signal to be measured but I think you are more on the safe side using a voltage divider for the input signal.
05-19-2016 03:21 AM
09-22-2016 08:22 PM - edited 09-22-2016 08:23 PM
09-23-2016 04:58 AM
If you want to measure some XX mV and have HV spikes you don't need to measure: Build a input protection circuit!
Depending on the dynamic range of the mV range needed (Assuming nearly DC), I would think of something like: Input current limiter 2 or 3 resistors (they usually have a 200V rating, but see spec of the resistors choosen!) building a 100k Ohm. Followed by a pair of anti-parallel diodes to V_low/GND , that will limit the voltages to ~700mV with a acceptable linear region up to ~ 200 mV (depending on the diodes 😉 ). If you don't want the V_low connected to GND: A neon bulb will limit the voltage to 90V (ingnition, later about 40-50V while glowing :D) an additional current liming resistor in the GND sens line isn't a bad idea.
The 100k input limiter to the 1M input impedance will matter: so an individual calibration with a voltage source, (to get mV use a low resistor voltage divider) and a second 9225 channel without protection circuit is quickly done.
11-01-2016 03:55 PM
One final detail to Henrik's solution to your problem: Put a pair of fuses, one on each wire, as close to the point where your instrumentation circuit meets your 600V circuit. That way, if there is an accidental short circuit in your instrumentation wiring during a 600V event, you will not cause a fire.
11-02-2016 04:39 AM
Very good point indeed, thanks!