2 terminals of differnt type error

[haab16]

My goal is to display more than one signal on ONE graph using the DAQ-6210.

After  bundling the signals i get a broken line saying " 2 terminals of differnt type"

Any idea what is going on?

Thanks in advance!

[P@Anand]

Please attach the code in 2011 version or attach a snippet of the code.

[Bob_Schor]

There is something wrong with the (two identical?) attachments.  They each download as a 58KB VI, but when I try to open them (in LabVIEW 2014), LabVIEW just "spins its wheels" and never opens.  [Well, not "never" -- after about a minute of watching Windows 7's "busy wheel" spin, I stopped LabVIEW myself ...].

If your code is sufficiently small/compact, you can embed a Snippet as an image, so we can both look at it (without needing LabVIEW) and can also open it in LabVIEW (that's the beauty of a Snippet -- it is both Code and Picture-of-code).  If you don't know how to make a Snippet, open LabVIEW Help and look for "VI Snippets" in the Index (not Search).

BS

[haab16]

HI there,

I have basically done a quick modification to

voltage-finite input.vi from Labview examples.

Thaanks

[GerdW]

Hi haab,

why do you create a cluster of 2 waveform arrays? Is this one of the supported datatypes of a waveform chart?

Replace BundleCluster by BuildArray (in concatenation mode)…

[haab16]

GOAL: to display more than one live measurements from USB-6210 on the same graph

I still see the same type of error. I know im doing something really silly.... cant figure out what.

[GerdW]

Hi haab,

I wrote "in concatenation mode"!!!

Right-click BuildArray and change it's mode!

[haab16]

Broken wire problem has fixed however, i am getting the error -50103. 

I found this link:

http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/485201B647950BF886257537006CEB89 

But for CASE 2 in the link, where should i place the waveform chart in the loop or outside?

Thanks!

[GerdW]

Hi haab,

error -50103 says: you are trying to use a resource already in use.

Which channels do you use? Are any channels used in both DAQmx tasks?

[Dennis_Knutson]

Using more than one task and DAQmx is just silly. The only thing you need is one of each. Combine both channels and your problems with the error and the graph go away.