LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Nasty bug with tables (LV 8.2)

I sure hope it is going to be fixed.  Maybe I should just go back to 8.0 then if it is not going to be fixed.  I have caused my program to crash numerous times by clicking on the table to look at some data.  This is one irritating bug.  I guess I can convert my array to spreadsheet string and output it to a string indicator instead of a table.

Brian

Brian
0 Kudos
Message 11 of 23
(3,188 Views)

I second Joe's reply.

So what can you do now?

Once a CAR (Corrective Action Report) has been filled, it will be passed to the appropriate group in R&D.

They will address the severity of the bug and it will be scheduled to be correct as indicated.

Once a developer get the reports and fixes the bug, the "fix" will subjected to ALPHA testing and then BETA testing.

If you know the CAR # (in this case "41I6CPA4" ) customers with a valid support contract can contact NI-Support and request a status update on the CAR.

So....

If you really need the fix, and are willing to live with the limitations of working with BETA ( see reply #40 in this thread on LAVA

http://forums.lavag.org/index.php?showtopic=2840&pid=17083&st=30&#entry17083

where Rolf Kalbermatter wrote "There are better ways to commit suicide wink.gif " )

you may be able to get an early version of the fix.

Ben

Retired Senior Automation Systems Architect with Data Science Automation LabVIEW Champion Knight of NI and Prepper LinkedIn Profile YouTube Channel
Message 12 of 23
(3,187 Views)
I will go one better and say that it is likely that an issue of this severity would be fixed by a maintenance release (i.e. something like an 8.2.1) should NI issue one for 8.2.  However, Ben's comments are correct too - such a release needs to go through rigorous testing, and I can't say at this point for sure when or even if such a maintenance release will be issued.
0 Kudos
Message 13 of 23
(3,163 Views)
I too am experiencing this crashing problem. Just for completeness, I'm using a compiled vi in embedded XP. Not that it's important but it seems to crash immediately in the compiled version where as it takes a couple clicks on my development machine, which is regular XP. Anyway, so I have an idea for a work around, which I've partially tested. If the table is disabled, the program does not crash. So it should be possible to disable the control and then programmatically add/update the table through property nodes and other controls. I am only using the table to display messages and I don't really need the user to interact with the indicator. I imagine that this might be a bit of extra code but sounds possible. Any thoughts on the idea? I'll re-post if it works out. 
0 Kudos
Message 14 of 23
(3,128 Views)
Just to follow up with my previous post, the work around that I suggested does in fact work, atleast for my application. Please see attached vi. It turns out that the crash only occurs with the table being an indicator and not a control.
 
Regards,
 
Bryan
0 Kudos
Message 15 of 23
(3,112 Views)
Solution (work around) !

Place an (invisible) decoration on the table and the problem is solved!
Message 16 of 23
(3,090 Views)
You can click in and out the table or copy data from the table without crashing labview now!

I have attached an example.
Message 17 of 23
(3,062 Views)
Whoa - that's wierd.  I thought you just meant to cover the whole table with a decoration (i.e. to prevent it from ever being clicked).  But, as your VI shows, all you need is a decoration covering part of the table.  Even with a 5 x 5 pixel decoration (apparently the smallest we can get) right in the bottom corner this works.

Thanks for this - it makes a huge difference for us.

Jaegen
0 Kudos
Message 18 of 23
(3,030 Views)


@Jeff B wrote:

I'm sorry I don't have a fix for you now, but I thought I'd at least let you know that this was reported to R&D (41I6CPA4) for further investigation.




For tracking purposes, the above problem report (41I6CPA4) was closed as a duplicate of 40A8TF70.
This was reported to R&D (# 40A8TF70) for further investigation.

Roy

Message 19 of 23
(2,943 Views)
Thank you for the workaround, however strange! After arguing for months to upgrade to LV 8.2 in my research group, we finally did so -- and then got bitten by this horrific bug. Is there some sort of mailing list we can be put on to find out when the official fix is released?
0 Kudos
Message 20 of 23
(2,576 Views)