03-17-2008 09:54 AM
Graham, Jochen,
Many thanks for your input.
I think there's an acceptable workaround. If necessary I can get away with having position data at a low rate (down to ~20 Hz), so either using an onboard program or polling for positions should be OK (if not ideal). If that fails I'll look into the 6602 board - thanks for the tip.
BHSC just seemed like a really good solution: neat code, not too CPU-intensive, jitter-free timing, and can be synchronised with the rest of my DAQ operations. I'm a bit surprised it doesn't seem to be more commonly used, but will look forward to a future NI-Motion update!
Cheers,
Ian
03-18-2008 05:48 AM
Hi Ian
I'm glad that you have an workaround that at least has the functionality even if not the desired speed. I will stay in contact with R&D and if they find a better solution I will get back in contact.
best regards
05-23-2008 09:02 AM
Hi Ian,
A quick update, R&D is still working on this problem; it has not been resolved yet. We will let you know as soon as it is fixed.
Best regards,
KostasB
NIUK Applications Engineering
06-05-2008 06:05 AM
06-09-2008 08:24 AM
06-09-2008 08:48 AM
06-09-2008 09:44 AM
06-18-2008 06:31 AM
06-26-2008 12:26 PM
06-30-2008 02:42 AM