12-04-2006 10:52 AM
12-06-2006 11:19 AM
12-07-2006 07:11 AM
hi tom,
cheers for the example code, it was very useful.however, i don't need to delay both AOs once the task has started, only one - so that when the task starts, 1 pulse train of digital pulses is generated and then (after some specific time delay) the second digital pulse train is generated.so the two pulse trains still have identical physical attributes (frequency, temporal width, amplitude) but they are offset from eachother by a constant temporal delay (100ns-1ms). i think i will prob need two counters for this, but is it still possible?
thanks again,
steve
12-07-2006 09:15 AM
12-07-2006 09:36 AM
hi tom,
cheers for reply.i'm afraid i don't have version 8.2 labview- could i ask you to send the previous code in version 8 instead?
cheers,
steve
12-07-2006 09:47 AM
For LabVIEW 8.0.
Tom.
NIUK
12-07-2006 10:55 AM
12-11-2006 07:22 AM
12-12-2006 08:53 AM
still very stuck on this problem
steve
12-12-2006 10:58 AM
Hi Steve,
I've run the code posted by Tom and it seems to retain the phase difference as required when run using my M-Series card (a 6221). Have you made any modifications to his example code?
Can you let us know how long it takes for the counters to go back into 'synch' again (you're saying the counters start with a time difference, then lock back into phase with each other somehow). Does the phase difference gradually disappear or 'snap' back instantly? How long do the counters stay out of phase after the start of the pulse train(s)?
If you could post a screenshot or save a batch of the analogue input to a file that may also help us.
Many thanks,
Mark
NI UK & Ireland