NI Labs Discussions

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

LabVIEW FPGA Advanced Session Resources Feedback

I'm having the same problem.  Could it be that the 2015 version zip file is corrupted?  I'm needing the Adv FPGA Resources for a VeriStand Sensor Simulation Custom Device.

0 Kudos
Message 41 of 66
(5,561 Views)

@NIKAE, @ChuckF, I am also seeing problems extracting from the 2015 version. The 2016 version, however, seems fine.

 

@HandyAndy, do you have access to the original 2015 version that you could re-upload?

0 Kudos
Message 42 of 66
(5,544 Views)

@Jon_Kokott, the only difference is the Advanced Sessions Resources solution is completely specified at run-time. The casting solution requires "datatohost" be hard-coded in a dialog at edit-time.

0 Kudos
Message 43 of 66
(5,543 Views)

I have the same issue. Does anyone find the solution?

0 Kudos
Message 44 of 66
(5,253 Views)

Any plans to make this officially part of LabVIEW?  I am hesitant to use something from NI Labs in a solution.  I know this forum makes it seem really solid but there is a concern of its status that the QA dept (or equivalent) of a customer would frown upon.


Certified LabVIEW Architect, Certified Professional Instructor
ALE Consultants

Introduction to LabVIEW FPGA for RF, Radar, and Electronic Warfare Applications
0 Kudos
Message 45 of 66
(5,056 Views)

2017 version?

 

Source code so we can make our own?

 

VI Package for easier install/dependency management by other libraries?

Cheers,

Matt Pollock
National Instruments
Message 46 of 66
(4,874 Views)

Worked with some internal folks: 2017 installer is now located here: http://ftp.ni.com/pub/devzone/NI_Labs/LVFPGA Adv Session Resources 17.0.zip

 

 

Cheers,

Matt Pollock
National Instruments
Message 47 of 66
(4,861 Views)

Thank you for posting.

 

Is there a reason the posted installer (installs to many versions of LabVIEW) is carries NI Labs license?  This is what prevents us from using it in our projects; customers would not look kindly on a product built with such a license, namely the High Risk Applications/System Failures section.


Certified LabVIEW Architect, Certified Professional Instructor
ALE Consultants

Introduction to LabVIEW FPGA for RF, Radar, and Electronic Warfare Applications
0 Kudos
Message 48 of 66
(4,855 Views)

The short answer is because that tool does not go through the same levels of internal testing and validation as official software products do, and we want to be very clear and upfront about that.  This software may have bugs that NI may not fix.

Cheers,

Matt Pollock
National Instruments
0 Kudos
Message 49 of 66
(4,851 Views)

I've hit an issue with GetResources. The "Data type" variant it returns doesn't seem to contain type definitions, even if the FPGA resource is type defined. It's handy to be able to sort items not just by name but by type definitions (go figure, typing something so you know what it is). Is this a bug/known issue? Or is that not expected to work?

 

I've worked around it by using the rvi GetControlsFromBitfile, which does properly return type data in its variants. Besides needing the bitfile path instead of its ref, are there any performance or other reasons not to use the rvi functions for resource detection instead of the GetResources function? I.E, I don't see a reason to ever use that function, just the OpenResourceByName. Thoughts?

 

Thanks! --Ryan

 

Edit: In case it matters, I'm in LabVIEW 2016.

0 Kudos
Message 50 of 66
(4,734 Views)