Replacing a Boolean operator with a Compound Arithemetic node should not change the operator

[Jim_Kring]

I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request, but I think it should be fixed/implemented, all the same 🙂

If you right-click on a Boolean funtion (And, Or, Exclusive Or, Not, etc.) and replace with a Compoint Arithmetic (CA) function, the CA function is always set to the "Or" configuration.  I would expect it to be smart and put the CA node into a configuration (including negation/inversion dots) that is equivalent to the Boolean function that it replaces.

[JackDunaway]

A very nicely illustrated version of Replacing Arithmetic or Boolean Operator with Compound Arithmetic...

[Mr.Mike]

I'd like to point out that the original idea has been moved to In Development.