Currently, the Third-Party Licensing and Activation Toolkit doesn't handle PPLs. This makes creating a plugin, pay-per-component architecture difficult. Handling licensing and activation of PPLs is needed as part of TPLAT or some other mechanism.
Can a TPLAT licensed Library be *inside* of a Packed Library (PPL)?
I don't know the answer, but maybe you know or can test.
Details
As we know, a Packed Library (.lvlibp) is created by converting a Library (.lvlib). This process breaks the TPLAT licensing of the Library (which is the main point of your idea/post -- it would be great to fix that).
However, a Library can also be contained ***inside*** of a Packed Library, and I wonder if it's possible for such a Library (inside the Packed Library) to be licensed with TPLAT.
So, instead of building your licensed Library (Licensed.lvlib) into a Packed Library (Licensed.lvlibp), put it inside a "wrapper" Library (Wrapper.lvlib:Licensed.lvlib) and build that into a Packed Library (Wrapper.lvlibp:Licensed.lvlib).
- Does the building of such a PPL even succeed? - Does the built PPL run? - Is Licensed.lvlib inside of the PPL (i.e. Wrapper.lvlibp:Licensed.lvlib) still licensed with TPLAT?
We took your possible workaround and tested it two ways. First with the licensed library nested inside of another library that was built into a PPL, and second, with the PPL dependent on the licensed library. Neither one had the desired effect. The problem is that there is no event/notification triggered when a PPL is loaded to set off TPLAT's activation
