Implicit consideration for Index in In Place Element Structure

[mrk_ramesh]

Please implicitly consider array index during index / replace elements in In Place Elements Structure if I am starting from Index 0

Present method:

Expected method:

[admin edit 2021-02-24]: placed images in-line with text and removed them as attachments

[wiebe@CARYA]

Here are the images, you we don't all need to download, open and delete them:

[Darren]

I edited the idea to include the images in-line with the text.

[fabric]

Yes! Parity with Index Array would be most welcome.

I'd also expect to be able to wire a 3 to the first index terminal and leave the rest unwired to get indices 3, 4, 5, ...

[Yamaeda]

Wait, what? They don't?

[TomOrr0W]

Index is currently a required input for for index/replace in In Place Element Structures, unfortunately. @Yamaeda

[AristosQueue (NI)]

I'm adding my kudos to this idea. I wish that had been done originally.

[altenbach]

This is a duplicate and has been proposed 12 years earlier!